Related Links

  1. Jihan Wu: "blocksize is a minor issue that cost the community so much damage. It has given too much opportunities for some people who are altcoin developers. We have more challenge to solve, for the future of Bitcoin rather than a blocksize thing."
  2. Why do people find it so hard to accept the irrefutable fact that Bitcoin is CURRENTLY, IN ITS PRESENT STATE, not fungible and that solving this problem is going to be very important problem going forward? Adam Back has solutions, but he hasn't had the time due to things like the blocksize debate.
  3. Serious question, if raising the max block size provides such a risk to centralization, why don't we decrease the max block size to 0.5 MB so more people can run nodes?
  4. BTCC: It would be much better to have the support of Core, but if Core doesn't include a blocksize increase soon in the master branch, we may be willing to start running a fork.
  5. Stephen Pair co-founder and CEO @Bitpay - The Bitcoin Core devs deserve a lot of credit for sticking to their guns on the blocksize issue.
  6. The Role of Bitcoin Nodes: Do Full Nodes Running in Data Centers Benefit the Bitcoin Network?
  7. No Fork, No Fire: Segwit2x Nodes Stall Running Abandoned Bitcoin Code
  8. The Blocks Are Now Full... So Where Were We on the Blocksize Debate?
  9. Adaptive blocksize proposal by BitPay
  10. Lewis Sanders IV (Reporter w/ DW News - Deutsche Welle): "Just realized the issue here. There's no $20m BTC wallet 'tied to' IS. Unfortunately this was added after I filed report."